No, I wouldn't expect that, because every indication previously was that she was PVS and had suffered significant deterioration of brain tissue.
I'm not the one attributing all evidence which disagrees with my view to some vast conspiracy.
Were not all the indications of he PVS diagnosis based on her ability to react visually? You have to wonder how these Dr.s could make such claims when they did not even know she was blind.
The word is trust. If you trust that everyone involved in this case had all honorable intentions then I could see your points. I on the other hand did not trust Michael Schiavo from the very beginning. I thing Judge Greer made some very huge mistakes in the beginning and had too much of an ego to retract his original findings - and so did all that he could from that point on to cover his ass. Not much of a stretch in the realm of possibilities and certainly not a vast conspiracy. All the other characters acted as their agendas dictated.