[unbalanced but fair]

Well, I read the section you posted and the others as well. The fact that officers didn't observe something doesn't mean it wasn't there. I got the idea that this was to help those 60% who didn't observe anything to learn how to do just that.

There was so much in there that you failed to mention: descriptions of signs of strangulation: the fact that they were talking about victims that could be interviewed, etc. I'm not going to post anything from there. I don't believe in excerpting out of context. But you posted the link, so others can read it and decide for themselves.

I'm curious as to why you think Mark Fuhrman would be credible. I read his book on the OJ and Skakel cases and thought they were simply synopses of what others had done. Nothing very revealing or impressive.

[bvw]

It answered DJ's question as to how no sign of strangulation was observed. Well, in domestic abuse cases of strangulation that's the USUAL circumstance.

If those cases were more thoroughly examined, who knows? But that is not present circumstance, nor was it when Terri was found near death at the house.