To: prion; All
any signs of violence would have healed in the decade and a half that transpired since her initial coma.
24 posted on
06/15/2005 9:35:39 AM PDT by
Sarah
To: Sarah
Quote: any signs of violence would have healed in the decade and a half that transpired since her initial coma.
My Dad had a heart attack 20 years ago and never new it. The doctor that did his test said he had one based upon the dead tissue and said it was at least 20 years ago.
27 posted on
06/15/2005 9:40:00 AM PDT by
superiorslots
(Free Traitors are communist China's modern day "Useful Idiots")
To: Sarah
Wow! Disappearing scars and seamlessly re-fused broken bones! It's a breakthrough in human physiology!
To: Sarah
"
any signs of violence would have healed in the decade and a half that transpired since her initial coma."
Read that statement over about three times and tell me what you are saying.
40 posted on
06/15/2005 9:48:18 AM PDT by
G.Mason
(The replies made by this poster are meant for self-amusement only. Read at your own discretion.)
To: Sarah
"any signs of violence would have healed in the decade and a half that transpired since her initial coma."
Actually they would still be visible to an experienced pathologist.
79 posted on
06/15/2005 10:22:05 AM PDT by
monday
To: Sarah
Wrong. Fibroids always mark prior trauma in soft tissue, and bones don't heal seamlessly.
95 posted on
06/15/2005 10:31:25 AM PDT by
Melas
(Lives in state of disbelief)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson