Gee, didn't the coronoer say that, too?
and he says there can be strangulation without evidence of strangulation.
After Sean baited him, of course he did.
Are you suggesting he's saying anything other than speculation? Ridiculous. He talked about a LOT of things that could have happened, but, then, so did the coroner.
Aint this that DeJa Vue deal all over again?
I like Mark Furhman I will read his book,however he is not talking much now because he has a book to sell. I dont think anything he said allows one to draw conclusions one way or another on the final events of this case. I think it does question whether the husband should have called the shots though.... but unless he was convicted of a crime I think there is no way to deny his standing .
I chalk this whole thing up as a tragedy and hope God will sort it all out in His own time