Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Janice Rogers Brown Nails the Marxists - (she dared say it! NY Times & liberals aghast!)
NEWSMAX.COM ^ | JUNE 15, 2005 | PHIL BRENNAN

Posted on 06/14/2005 2:58:16 PM PDT by CHARLITE

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-135 next last
To: marty60
Great, the lady has a brain. Thanks for the post.
81 posted on 06/14/2005 5:40:42 PM PDT by pointsal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE
I haven't read it all yet, but, wow! A real constitutionalist. We need to put this lady on the Supreme Court. There is still hope.
82 posted on 06/14/2005 5:41:16 PM PDT by Colorado Buckeye (It's the culture stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave

I think that is one wonderful black woman, extraordinaire!!! God bless her all the time!!!


83 posted on 06/14/2005 6:30:47 PM PDT by SierraWasp (Arnold Schwarzenrenegger is Cauleeforneeah's Greenievenator!!! He's infected with GANG-GREEN!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Colorado Buckeye; SierraWasp; Congressman Billybob; knews_hound; AmericanArchConservative; ...
"We need to put this lady on the Supreme Court. There is still hope."

I would LOVE to see the president nominate Janice Rogers Brown to the first SCOTUS vacancy! Even make her Chief Justice. Can anyone think of any reason why not?

Char :)

84 posted on 06/14/2005 6:48:33 PM PDT by CHARLITE (I propose a co-Clinton team as permanent reps to Pyonyang, w/out possibility of repatriation....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: infidel29
Janice Rogers Brown for supreme court? Hell no!! Janice Rogers Brown for President!

Neat idea, but she is far more valuable on the Supreme Court. She's only in her middle fifties; a lifetime appointment to the Supreme Court trumps a 4-to-8 year presidential term.
85 posted on 06/14/2005 6:48:59 PM PDT by so_real ("The Congress of the United States recommends and approves the Holy Bible for use in all schools.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: so_real

Too true, I wish the party leaders would start calling the traitorous socialists that have hijacked the democratic party for what they are. Crazed lunatics willing to sell out America and it's values for political power, personal gain, and social standing. They represent nothing close to traditional American values and should be revealed for what they are.


86 posted on 06/14/2005 7:07:25 PM PDT by infidel29 ("It is only the warlike power of a civilized people that can give peace to the world."- T. Roosevelt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

Keep me on your ping list

I'm seeing more and more Socialists and Marxists posting on Free Republic. They're not flamers, they are subtle. I suspect they are World Worker party members or Hillary's thugs.

I could just be paranoid, but the patterns keep coming up.


87 posted on 06/14/2005 7:11:23 PM PDT by listenhillary (Socialists have only killed 100 million. We'll never learn will we?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tubebender

I think it was Pete Wilson. She's been around since 96 or 97, I think.


88 posted on 06/14/2005 7:29:23 PM PDT by getmeouttaPalmBeachCounty_FL (H.R. 698 - go drop anchor somewhere else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Blurblogger

Doesn't sound like a slip. It sounds like Schumer was trying to make Janice Rogers Brown look like an extremist.

http://committeeforjustice.org/cgi-data/press/files/16.shtml

SCHUMER: "And my favorite, one of their nominees said that the whole New Deal was a Socialist revolution, and we ought to go back to the 1890s. No labor laws, no wages and hours laws..."

REALITY: In an extra-curricular speech, Justice Brown said the New Deal was the triumph of America's "socialist revolution," i.e. unlike many European nations, the U.S. reaction to the Great Depression was not a full fledged embrace of central planning and nationalized industry but rather the far milder New Deal. This is an unremarkable observation as a matter of history; moreover, it was not a point about the Constitution or American jurisprudence.


89 posted on 06/14/2005 8:00:42 PM PDT by listenhillary (Socialists have only killed 100 million. We'll never learn will we?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

Thanks for the ping!


90 posted on 06/14/2005 8:46:01 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: montag813
Hanraty is just a goofball to me, not serious or seminal at all. But Savage is the only one I look forward to hearing. Savage just delivers stunning off-the-cuff commentary day after day--and he is so damned entertaining!

Notice that people who attack him here on FR don't get beyond irrelevancies such as his real name (Weiner, they say "Wiener" to deride him childishly), his supposed low ratings and low book sales, and his "abusiveness" (which I have never observed as being undeserved when callers are Muslims or anti-Semetic scum). There never seems to be substantive, factual criticism of this guy.


Sorry, Montag, but calling Hannity "hanraty" sort of makes your next point moot, eh? Perhaps Savage is just plain obnoxious. When you call someone a pig, such as I've heard him on numerous occasions, whether deserved or not, that's not exactly civil discourse and certainly not a way to win someone over to your side. I could care less about his real name. He's just obnoxious and yells at his callers frequently. I call it trashmouth talk radio. He calls a colleague/competitor Hush Bimbo? Come on. He's engaging in exactly what you said FR does.

If you think Savage is some sort of saviour, that's your opinion. Lots of others just think he's rude and irritating.

tenger
91 posted on 06/14/2005 9:08:05 PM PDT by tenger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE
Make no mistake about it, the issue of Janice Rogers Brown and her fellow constitutionalist jurists is the issue that America faces at this crucial moment in our history: It is a matter of constitutional freedom vs. Marxist oppression.

Well, there it is, the crux of the culture war. Traditional American freedom is under assault from the neo-Marxists (liberals and secularists), who'll align themselves with anyone - such as muslim extremists - to achieve their nefarious goals. And until Joe Sixpack wakes up and realizes this, we're going to have an ongoing struggle.

92 posted on 06/14/2005 9:10:41 PM PDT by Marauder (Politicians use words the way a squid uses ink.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head
Your excerpt of Brown's words show her to be a common sense, liberty defending judge. But seven of those words: our ability to control our own destiny are at the crux of the liberals' attempts to stop conservative judges from being seated. They will do everything they can to be the ones who pull the "destiny" strings.

Thanks for the ping, Jeff. A great article.

93 posted on 06/14/2005 9:14:13 PM PDT by Minuteman23
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Marauder
"....until Joe Sixpack wakes up and realizes this, we're going to have an ongoing struggle."

I truly believe that what we do here on Free Republic helps enormously to get the truth out to "Joe Sixpacks" all over America. Time will tell, and we'll know more about how effective we've been, with the 2006 elections.

By the 2008 general elections, if Hillary goes down in flames, then we will REALLY see what a big difference we've made. Everything will depend on all of us working "round-the-clock" to expose her for the socialist/marxist power monger that she is, and all those who will be supporting her......not the least of whom will be George Soros. You can count on that!

Thanks for your comments, Marauder!

Char :(

94 posted on 06/14/2005 9:19:37 PM PDT by CHARLITE (I propose a co-Clinton team as permanent reps to Pyonyang, w/out possibility of repatriation....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: tenger
orry, Montag, but calling Hannity "hanraty" sort of makes your next point moot, eh?

No tenger, Sean Hannity cannot be considered along with serious talk radio hosts. He is a joke next to any of Rush, Savage, Levin, Ingraham et al. Next...

95 posted on 06/14/2005 10:09:26 PM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: tenger
He's just obnoxious and yells at his callers frequently. I call it trashmouth talk radio.

I am not interested in "new tone" talkradio. Sorry. Callers who are scum get blasted. Rush's calm discussions with well-meaning liberals are all well and good, but some idiots, America-haters and anti-Semites just need to be spanked and yanked, as Bob Grant did famously for decades. Savage does only that. He treats most callers with great respect, and lets them drive the direction of his show like no other host does. It is by far the most democratic show I have ever heard.

96 posted on 06/14/2005 10:13:45 PM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: FormerACLUmember

"Awesome! She is AMAZING! This was worth every second of the two year wait."

Ditto that!

Back during the Great Depression, there were a lot of people who helped wandering strangers. They didn't expect much from the gov'ment. They said, "You will get some stew. And you will earn it by working around here."

And they didn't expect the stranger to be violent, because most Americans back then were good Christians, not hooked on crack, not awash with thoughts of sodomy, adultery, promiscuity, and multi-culturalism that alienate them from the Bible. Not to mention, people had guns to defend their homes and were willing to use them.

The only good thing FDR did was banking reform, and I bet there's a better way of doing that.


97 posted on 06/15/2005 4:07:05 AM PDT by Arthur Wildfire! March (<<<< Profile page streamlined, solely devoted Schiavo research)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Blurblogger; Liz

I ditto liz: Supreme Court.


98 posted on 06/15/2005 4:10:36 AM PDT by Arthur Wildfire! March (<<<< Profile page streamlined, solely devoted Schiavo research)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: SC Swamp Fox

"Brown-Rice?"

I hear it's healthy.


99 posted on 06/15/2005 4:11:13 AM PDT by Arthur Wildfire! March (<<<< Profile page streamlined, solely devoted Schiavo research)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

I hope she is here to stay.


100 posted on 06/15/2005 4:19:33 AM PDT by SMARTY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-135 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson