Skip to comments.
Janice Rogers Brown Nails the Marxists - (she dared say it! NY Times & liberals aghast!)
NEWSMAX.COM ^
| JUNE 15, 2005
| PHIL BRENNAN
Posted on 06/14/2005 2:58:16 PM PDT by CHARLITE
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-135 next last
To: CHARLITE
Some good taglines in there.
21
posted on
06/14/2005 3:17:27 PM PDT
by
Brett66
(Where government advances – and it advances relentlessly – freedom is imperiled -Janice Rogers Brown)
To: HarleyLady27
President of the United States Janis Rodgers Brown 2008 Vice President of the United States Condi Rice 2008 now there is a team that CAN"T BE BEAT!!! While you'll certainly get no argument from me, you...uh...do realize that the bumpersticker for that would read "Brown/Rice"???
22
posted on
06/14/2005 3:18:13 PM PDT
by
Christian4Bush
(Stop global WHINING!!!)
To: Jeff Head; SierraWasp; Jim Robinson; John Robinson; tubebender; Shermy; RonDog; ...
Judge Brown has been the best kept secret in California for years.
The MSM out here basically has tried to keep news about her in the dark or on page 20 of section Z.
California in spite of all the bricks thrown at us has produced a few conservatives.:)
23
posted on
06/14/2005 3:18:37 PM PDT
by
Grampa Dave
(The MSM has been a WMD, Weapon of Mass Disinformation for the Rats for at least 5 decades.)
To: CHARLITE
Be careful. She may even come after Republicans. She is a conservative and isn't afraid to call on Republican expansion of power.
24
posted on
06/14/2005 3:19:21 PM PDT
by
econ_grad
(The US Constitution presents no significant challenge to the government.)
To: CHARLITE
Michael savage was the first on air to reveal that Schumer slipped with the "OUR Socialist revolution" comment. Savage has been exceptional in eviserating Schumer and in describing the political and psychological story behind the "electronic lynching" of Justice Brown.
To: Christian4Bush
ut oh roflmao didn't think about that, now how can we work that out?????
26
posted on
06/14/2005 3:23:19 PM PDT
by
HarleyLady27
(My ? to Libs: "Do they ever shut up on your planet?")
To: CHARLITE
This lady rocks! I can see why the socialists were up in arms over her nomination.
27
posted on
06/14/2005 3:24:32 PM PDT
by
andyk
(Go Matt Kenseth!)
To: infidel29
A Rice/Rodgers ticket! What a deal!
28
posted on
06/14/2005 3:29:36 PM PDT
by
Lorianne
To: SmithL
We in California are missing an outstanding State Supreme Court Justice.
That aspect of this does suck. Has Arnold named a possible replacement yet?
To: CHARLITE
Truth is often offensive, which is why speech has to be protected.
To: SpaceBar
It was Charles Schumer who first called New Deal policies socialist in a beautiful freudian slip while grilling Ms. Brown for her judicial appointment and accusing her of "turning back our socialist agenda..." or something similar.
Wow....Please find that again, if possible and ping me!
31
posted on
06/14/2005 3:37:45 PM PDT
by
The Spirit Of Allegiance
(SAVE THE BRAINFOREST! Boycott the RED Dead Tree Media & NUKE the DNC Class Action Temper Tantrum!)
To: CHARLITE
32
posted on
06/14/2005 3:38:51 PM PDT
by
Libertina
(nonewgastax.com (We're going to win!))
To: montag813
It was Michael Savage that drew widespread attention to Lt. Pantano, and it was Michael Savage that recognized Islamoterror long before 9/11, and other things too numerous to mention. He's got an excellent track record and he's a straight shooter even if you disagree with him on things, yet mentioning him on FreeRepublic might get you severely flamed. "He just yells...", "he's entertaining but then goes off..." blah blah blah. We've heard it all before. Perhaps he hits too close to home for some folks. Savage is also the only radio talk show worth listening to. How much rah-rah siss-boom-bah can one handle? Did I mention that liberalism is a mental disorder?
33
posted on
06/14/2005 3:39:34 PM PDT
by
SpaceBar
To: CHARLITE
It'd be great if she could join Scalia and Thomas on the high court, but I dont' think that will happen. Though if you think about it, how can this collection of 7 'moderate' Democrats justify a filibuster of her for the Sup Court after having already voted to give her an up or down vote once?
34
posted on
06/14/2005 3:39:43 PM PDT
by
Aetius
To: CHARLITE
If you know that Brown refers to Hayek, you understand instantly that she would offend "the socialists of all parties."
35
posted on
06/14/2005 3:40:05 PM PDT
by
conservatism_IS_compassion
(The idea around which liberalism coheres is that NOTHING actually matters but PR.)
To: SpinyNorman
I guess their love of communism trumps their alleged support of the upward mobility of blacks. They are very supportive of Blacks as long as they know their place.
36
posted on
06/14/2005 3:40:42 PM PDT
by
nosofar
To: nutmeg
37
posted on
06/14/2005 3:40:50 PM PDT
by
nutmeg
("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." - Hillary Clinton 6/28/04)
To: Blurblogger
As alluded to in post #25 by montag813, Savage played a soundbite with Schumer making a very telling slip of the tongue. I believe it was early last week.
38
posted on
06/14/2005 3:41:48 PM PDT
by
SpaceBar
To: CHARLITE
the democrat plantation will never be the same again.
39
posted on
06/14/2005 3:42:27 PM PDT
by
ken21
(if you didn't see it on tv, then it didn't happen. /s)
To: CHARLITE
Condi's got a running mate!
40
posted on
06/14/2005 3:44:41 PM PDT
by
muir_redwoods
(Free Sirhan Sirhan, after all, the bastard who killed Mary Jo Kopeckne is walking around free)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-135 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson