Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Huck; phoenix_004
I think it's lame that the administration gets away with having no time tables, no estimates, no assumptions. Just cutesy "however long it takes" rhetoric, and a total lack of information to the American public.

Imagine asking FDR in 1942 how much its going to cost, and how long are we going to be over there...

The answer then, as now, is that its unknowable. It depends in part on the enemy. How long will it be before the enemy sees this fight as hopeless, unwinnable, and gives it up? An important piece of this puzzle is the perception the enemy has of our resolve. If he sees us waver every time we take a hit, then hope for him is still alive, and the fight continues.

I would say that the time table is tied to the Iraqi government's ability to defend itself, and there are probably still a couple of names from the "deck of cards" that we want to take down before we declare victory. Those two are probably the bottom line issues, and how that relates to a calendar is probably irrelevant.

Beyond that, my guess is that we aren't leaving until Syria has been pushed into holding elections. So my guess is we're there for another five years.

47 posted on 06/14/2005 2:08:11 PM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: marron
" Imagine asking FDR in 1942 how much its going to cost, and how long are we going to be over there..."

You raise a good point. That is why the military [draftees included] had to serve for 'the duration' plus 6 months. The metric was unconditional surrender.

54 posted on 06/14/2005 2:17:16 PM PDT by ex-snook (Exporting jobs and the money to buy America is lose-lose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson