Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MizSterious
it's hard to find "evidence" other than the child's accusations

Most children don't have a prior track record of lies in legal cases.

This case was just too dirty to sort through. Since the mother was there and an active player in the relationship and proximity of the child to MJ... She's relevant. And if she'd shown to make things up and get her kid to play along, the case has to be thrown out.

This whole trial is a circus side show.

88 posted on 06/14/2005 8:27:04 AM PDT by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]


To: HairOfTheDog

We'll have to disagree on that. Child molesters typically choose that kind of child deliberately, sort of like insurance if they get caught. Jackson did so, too, in my estimation. If the truth were known, I'm betting that he investigated this family first, before he started messing with the boy, just to make sure they wouldn't be believed. He chose well, apparently. (But not for the boy...)


93 posted on 06/14/2005 8:29:24 AM PDT by MizSterious (First, the journalists, THEN the lawyers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson