I said I wouldn't answer you but here's my last one. I don't understand what your position is on this Michael Jackson affair. From what I can see, you've stated no real opinions one way or another - until after I pressed you with some questions, and your comments have basically been very critical barbs directed at various posters, regardless of their position on the issue apparently. I don't understand what you're debating frankly or if you're just blowing off some kind of steam.
As for a question you asked me - what question? That comment about Butterfly? That has nothing to do with the Michael Jackson debate. Butterfly has been debating this issue with a variety of posters all day and very ably. She didn't just pop in here attacking people as you have. You might go back and read some of the previous comments throughout the day to see what the discussions have been about. Frankly, that's all I have to say to you.
I've told you this before, but for your sake I'll repeat myself.
I believe Michael Jackson is a pedophile.
I don't know whether this boy was a victim.
I believe the prosecution FAILED MISERABLY in attempting to prove the second statement.
The jury should not be condemned for assuming facts not in evidence.
So Butterfly is ably debating by saying she hopes that a criminal gets away with molesting another poster's children? I don't think so. AB is a child. Perhaps she doesn't know any better. I'm giving her a chance to learn.
BTW, I'm soooo nasty, that when she told me to go to hell I DIDN'T call a mod for abuse or even respond in kind. Guess I better try harder at being nasty, huh? :-)