Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Richard Axtell
Add to that the pornography, and the on camera, admission by Michael Jackson of his history of sleeping with boys, not to mention the millions paid out to hush up previous accusations.

If having porn at home is a proof of molestation then tens of millions are guilty of molestation. Jackson has admitted to sleeping in the same room as kids but not to molestation. The settlements are not necessarily proof of anything either. This is no more proof of molestation than living next door to an elementary school is.

2,683 posted on 06/13/2005 6:58:27 PM PDT by garbanzo (Free people will set the course of history)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2672 | View Replies ]


To: garbanzo

Do you think it's normal for a grown man to have a book filled with pictures of naked little boys, in various poses?


2,684 posted on 06/13/2005 7:00:03 PM PDT by tuffydoodle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2683 | View Replies ]

To: garbanzo
"If having porn at home is a proof of molestation then tens of millions are guilty of molestation."

Millions did not use pornography as part of their pedophillic seduction, as Michael Jackson was testified to have done.

"Jackson has admitted to sleeping in the same room as kids but not to molestation."

Jackson admitted to living a life outside of reality and responsibility expected of a 46 year old man. Reports of his sleeping in the same bed with a boy during the duration of his last European tour make his experience quite distinct from "millions" of non-pedophiles also.

"The settlements are not necessarily proof of anything either. This is no more proof of molestation than living next door to an elementary school is."

Your last statement is absurd, and I will let it go, written off as hyperbole, but the settlements ARE proof that Michael does not learn from his experiences. The latest accusations came after influential friends and advisors, Quincy Jones in particular, pleaded with him to change his self-destructive lifestyle.

Instead, Jackson sinks further into his self-created Peter Pan world, where no one can harm him. The MO of the latest accusation matches the earlier ones: he buys young boys by smothering the dysfunctional and irresponsible parent or parents with gifts and largesse.

Did the mother lie? Of course. She is trash, perfect for Jackson's MO. She should have been a co-defendant in the exploitation of her own son.

But, all in all, you are right. Jackson got off because it was easy to do. The jury members are clearly lightweights. I am listening to them describe their verdict as I type this. They were predisposed to let him off the hook. And now he will continue his behaviors, until something tragically goes even more wrong than before.

2,729 posted on 06/13/2005 7:36:19 PM PDT by Richard Axtell (There's gonna be hell to pay, so get out yer checkbooks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2683 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson