Naw, ya sounding like the DU nuts now..
It wasen't an airtight case against him..Thats all there is to it..I'd like to see him behind bars but you have to have serious proof..The jusy seemed responsible to me .
The lawyers on Court TV said they thought the conspiracy charge wouldn't stick, and they wondered about the effect the mother's testimony would have on the jury. But they said the last, the rebuttal witness tape was extremely effective for the prosecution...a man, a youth minister, recently married, totally believable. This witness, the lawyers said, was rock solid believable. But the prosecution couldn't get anyone in Jackson's pay to stand up and tell the truth about his behavior. Well, it's all in that book that came out last week....written by a close friend of more than 30 years. Should sell like hot cakes. I hope the jury had doubts about his innocence, and that's why it took them a week to sort through the evidence. Maybe it wasn't just the good food. But they didn't come across as having a lick of sense.