To: GRRRRR
They same woman also said that she would wonder what mother in her right mind would allow their son to sleep with MJ or any man for that matter...didn't we just hear 10 not guilty verdicts??? Is she saying that the kids DID sleep with Micheal...but no funny business took place??? sounds like it
UNBELIEVABLE
2,051 posted on
06/13/2005 3:31:48 PM PDT by
Mo1
To: Mo1
I can't believe these people are so damned stupid!
2,055 posted on
06/13/2005 3:32:55 PM PDT by
kcvl
To: Mo1
Providing pornographic material to a child is no longer a crime in California. They had fingerprints on the magazines and that didn't convict him.
2,067 posted on
06/13/2005 3:34:20 PM PDT by
tobyhill
(The war on terrorism is not for the weak!)
To: Mo1
Government is basically 100x more incompetent when compared with the private sector. When there is a lot of money to buy the best, they can run rings around the much more restricted prosecutors. Plus proving guilt is tough.
Plus, the motives of the accusers are always suspect especially when there is a time lag between crime and reporting of crime. The accusers mom was apparently a loose cannon who antagonized the jury.
I don't expect that Michael Jackson will be making a comeback. And I hope he changes his ways now.
2,096 posted on
06/13/2005 3:37:13 PM PDT by
RobFromGa
(Send Bolton to the UN!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson