Wow, how many of you watched the entire trial?
How many of you were in the jury room during deliberations?
It looks to me like these people took their time, discussed, and then came back with a thoroughly considered verdict.
Was reasonable doubt what did it? What do you expect juries to do?
They can't all be morons.
"They can't all be morons."
Sure they can... and these jurors were morons.
I agree with you entirely. Think I'll get some flak for this statement - trashing the jury verdict and ignoring the accuser's shady past cannot be substitutes for reason and logic in this decision.
Really? Then how do you explain the O.J. verdict?