Exactly as I predicted. Celebs walk!
Check out what the Libs over at DU are saying ...
(they take care of their own!)
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x1545914
Otoh, Leno should be good tonight.
He can celebrate with a slumber party.
The SOB got away with it and will be sleeping with little boys again tomorrow.
As we found out in the O.J. case, there is one justice system for us and a different justice system for rich black folks like O.J. and Wacko Jacko.
This is a total travesty of justcie, just as the O.J. verdict was. If you're a celebrity, you can do anything and get away with it.
Everyone knows he did it.
Acquitted because he is young, "gifted," black, and rich.
Shame on this jury is right! GOD help future children from this freak!
Well, now he's free to go and molest again. Every young boy within 100 miles of Neverland is in danger.
He got away with it.
It won't actually MAKE him any more "innocent," however.
On egood thing about the timing is that it takes attention away from the MSM's attempt to create the public sentiment for a pullout timetable in Iraq.
we both thought he was not guilty... i'm not surprised at the verdict...
I thought he would be found guilty, but then I remembered the case was tried in California, the France of the United States. How could I forget? Only Bush is guilty when it comes to California, the France of the United States. Oh well, the worlds most blatant pedophile gets to continue raping boys. Congratulations Calfornia on doing it twice. A double killer is playing golf and a blatant pedo gets to prey on more dysfunctional families.
This won't be popular but.
The right decision was made, and it was made for this reason.
The mother is a professional con-artist, she plays victim for a living, I forgot all the people she's sued, (I know one of them was a shopping guard who she claimed had assualted her), and she saw Micheal Jackson, and well she knew what she was doing.
Seriously, who actually leaves theie kids with Micheal Jackson. When you combine the fact that she has her history, and the fact that she left the kid with Jacko...
She was looking for a mark, Mesereau had it right.
Now, if we are going to use OJ as one extreme and Kobe as another, I think this case falls in the middle. With OJ, you had a clear miscarriage of justice, not only did he deserve to be convicted, but he was actually on trial for a crime he was guilty of.
In Kobe, you had the exact opposite, you had a woman of loose morals willingly act as a groupie to Kobe, you had her bragging about it, and then suddenly, she realizes that she can make some money off of this. Notice that as soon as she dropped the criminal charges, she began expressing official interest in a civil case.
Micheal falls in the middle. I do believe he is guilty of child molestation and deserves to be sent to prison for it, but, I just don't believe he is guilty in this case. That mother is clearly not to be trusted, and considering this is not the first time she's had a mark case around the children, I don't think they are to be trusted either. As a parent, it revolts me to say this, but, you've got to do better.
You know Jacko has actually molested children, find an actual case and charge him on it, and make sure when you charge it, that the mother is not first class grifter.
This being said, I do believe there is enough evidence (even if I doubt the validity of this particular case) to bring Jackson up for suit in civil court where the burden of proof is lower, and I think that will happen in this case.
HELLO! ;-)