[sdpatriot]

i agree with you. that might explain why the idiot author thinks sobriety checkpoints are "ok" . notice he didn't say "constitutional". he probably thinks the use of drug sniffing dogs are ok too... all for the good of "public safety" of course (rolling eyes here).

[DCPatriot]

I'm glad you cited the ridiculous notion that "sobriety checkpoints okay".

IMO, they fall under "unreasonable search and .....".