All 3 are children of privilage. The Dutch kid was a regular at the bar he wasn't supposed to be in till he was 18. I suspect that I coming days we'll hear all kinds of stories about them walking all over other people.
On another site it was said that van der Sloot had gotten into a shoving match with one or more of Natalie's classmates.
Van Sloot's mother was on tv, two snippets of time. Poor woman. First interview, probably a few days ago, she said her boy was innocent, and she was heartbroken about Natalee and praying for her and her family all the time. She looked very, very upset. She knows her son, let's face it. Second interview, she looked like an unmade bed, desperate, that haunted look in the back of her eyes -- she knew her son was guilty, and was falling apart. This time she didn't say he was innocent, just that she was praying for Natalee and her parents and that she had them in her heart and mind all the time. That son of hers, there was a picture of him a few days back, taken at some party...he had a half naked adolescent girl on a leash. Both laughing it up. He ran wild, and Natalee's friends said everytime they looked around, there he was...stalking her.
I also heard that the Dutch kid had been gambling also in the bars. Do they not have legal age limits on this stuff?