[js1138]

* Those in favor of the "narrow" definition of "Creationism" (God did it via "poof") Posts: 15 (MitchellC), 19 (thomaswest), 20 (Bonaparte), 22 (taxesareforever), 43 (Alamo-Girl), and of course me.

I'm pinging Alamo-girl to this because I think she said she is not a poofist.

There are those who believe that science is completely valid from the human perspective of time.

[PatrickHenry]

I think you can put down Barney Frank as a poof-ist. Or at least a poof.

[Alamo-Girl]

Thank you so much for the ping!

I'm pinging Alamo-girl to this because I think she said she is not a poofist. There are those who believe that science is completely valid from the human perspective of time.

Indeed. My response at 43 was to define the term "creationism" more thoroughly. The term actually means "God created the universe.". The mechanism - poof or not - is a secondary issue, a doctrinal issue.

I personally do not dispute the age of the universe from our space/time coordinates, nor do I dispute that the age of the universe from God's inception space/time coordinates as creation week plus approximately 6000 years.