Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: lewislynn

Besides the 23% rate still assumes a 100% compliance rate. They just take the total taxes replaced add in their tax credit and divide that by total consumption. To hang their hat on the 23% rate is just plain silly and dishonest.


977 posted on 06/12/2005 5:56:11 PM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 974 | View Replies ]


To: Always Right
To hang their hat on the 23% rate is just plain silly and dishonest.
Truthfully, have you ever run across a more dishonest bunch? Dishonesty is their forte.
981 posted on 06/12/2005 6:03:44 PM PDT by lewislynn ( Is calling for energy independence a "protectionist" act?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 977 | View Replies ]

To: Always Right
BTW, in your #1 example you give them way too much credit. The rate wouldn't be 37% it would be 39%.

The fairtax taxes the "gross payment" A 7% state sales tax would also be taxed in the "gross payment".

$1.00 plus 7% state = $1.07 plus 29.87% "gross payment" tax = $1.39 or 39% total.

Making the "fairtax" 32% tax exclusive not 29.87%...

991 posted on 06/12/2005 6:21:46 PM PDT by lewislynn ( Is calling for energy independence a "protectionist" act?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 977 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson