Good. Pigdog apparently does, though.
Nope, you've got it wrong, pittipat. I'd love to see those lower tax rates and I think we probably will either with the passage of the bill or very shortly thereafter.
I believe the economic expansion alone will cause the rates to drop. No matter what the rate, though, I still expect to see it calculated correctly from whatever rate is in the final bill. It that is 23% t-i, then the correct t-e rate would be 29.87% since it would be derived from the bill's figure. Sales tax rates are frequently carried to two decimal places but I have never seen them calculated beyond that.
Good. Pigdog apparently does, though.
Are you agreeing that 19-20% is the more proper revenue-neutral rate as should be implemented for the FairTax legislation? or do you have a better estimate of current conditions, not those existing back in the Clinton era.
Remember, I asked you for your estimate of revenue neutral rate for the FairTax, not mine, and the best common measure to use to represent it for comparison with other tax plans competing with the NRST like "Flat Tax", Business Transaction Tax, VAT or some lesser modification of the current income tax system.
Still looking for your answers. Seems to me discussion depends on laying out where everyone stands on the NRST rate and whether or not the proposed value in the legislation means anything other than a provisional place holder and going from there.
That, to me, is the best way to get the board cleared, and discuss merits rather than continual digressions on the trivial.