Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: expatpat; pigdog; EternalVigilance

It's piggy and the ancient one who are arguing that it is 29.87% and not 30%.

Actually I figure the final rate will be much closer to 19% tax inclusive or 23.46% tax exclusive, based on federal tax cuts implemented since the original rate was calculated for the 1999 intoduction of the bill.

Why not use 19% or 23% tax exclusive as may actually come out of Congress in meeting the presidents revenue neutral policy, looks like a better number for discussion purposes than either of the above to me.

920 posted on 06/12/2005 3:49:05 PM PDT by ancient_geezer (Don't reform it, Replace it!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 856 | View Replies ]


To: ancient_geezer

Maybe we should argue for a 10% rate. Most of the SQLs would scream like stuck pigs at the lost revenue to their beloved status quo.


925 posted on 06/12/2005 3:56:43 PM PDT by EternalVigilance ("Quality of life": Another name for the slippery slope into barbarism...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 920 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson