Posted on 06/10/2005 8:36:44 AM PDT by Kaslin
Rec'd a call earlier this week from a person asking what my feelings were about the ACLU. I unloaded on the fellow. While I was ranting about how bad the ACLU was, I wondered if this person was doing a survey for the ACLU or was going to ask for money or both. So I changed tactics told the fellow to call me back later since I was going out. Have been fielding my calls through the message center since.
Hannity stepped over a fence that was a ways inside the US border. He did not touch Mexico. And since when is it against American law for an American to enter Mexico?
It sais right in the article
In the first paragraph of the article it mentions pro bono attorneys - there may not be much pro bono to it because as I understand - there is a law and I don't know the number that says if a law suit is filed in a civil rights matter the person being sued has to pay the legal fees of the person that sued them.
Company A fires someone because they won't bath before they come to work - ACLU sues in the 9th Circus Court on the behalf of "Stinky" and wins then Company A has to pay Stinkys legal fees plus damages or whatever 9th Circus Court awards Stinky because of hurt feelings
I guess it is only pro bono if Stinky looses and is instructed to bath from here on
Yeah I remember that. He was showing it on Hannity and Colmes. They are nuts
And I will enjoy the day this happens
I know, but what is Hedgecock's connection to the wording as it appears on the ballot? Did he write it?
Ping for a later read!
you are so great..says it all THANKS
First things first: The first post, in any ACLU thread posted on FR, should carry the following paragraph for context...
Roger Baldwin, the co-founder of the ACLU said: “I am for socialism, disarmament, and ultimately, for abolishing the state itself. … I seek social ownership of property, the abolition of the properties class, and sole control of those who produce wealth. Communism is the goal. I don’t regret being part of the communist tactic. I knew what I was doing. I was not an innocent liberal. I wanted what the communists wanted and I traveled the United Front road to get it.” In spite of Baldwin’s Communist leanings, President Jimmy Carter awarded him the Presidential Medal of Freedom on January 16, 1981.
Baldwin didn’t create the ACLU in a vacuum, he had plenty of help. A group of Communist Party officials, fellow travelers, anarchists and radicals joined Baldwin to found the ACLU in 1920.
Now then, a couple of questions and observations.
As I understand it, this foreign agent, " Arizona State Rep. Kyrsten Sinema" in concert with the Communist group consider an accidental border crossing "an offense that could not be tolerated", but simultaneous crossing in the opposite direction by hundreds, perhaps thousands of criminals (illegal entry is still a federal crime, close as I can tell) is freaking invisible"???
Seems to be a proper recall is in order for one, and charges of sedition for both. Yes, I believe a cultural war qualifies.
Where ae the groups with the motivation, moxie and clout to pursue this as a counterattack?
You need more funds? Just ask for them! This unrich American would be happy to contribute on a continuing basis!
Man, I don't know how I missed this news about the ACLU suing Hannity. When did this happen? Is there really a court date, etc?
According to Hannity he stepped through a hole in the fence into a 3 foot buffer zone that was still US territory. He never crossed into Mexico and returned.
Despite the lack of a "crime", the ACLU and Arizona State Rep. Kyrsten Sinema peed all over themselves with excitement and were demanding a public execution or something similar. Meanwhile thirty miles further along the border, illegals continued to stream in while they did nothing.
Try this.
ACLU is an arm of the Democrat Party.
What is the tort that Hannity committed against the ACLU?For a suit to be pursued there must be damage....what is the damage to the party bringing the suit? Will a court even entertain such a waist of time?
This is actually a disastrous strategy for the ACLU, and a golden opportunity to drive the wooden stake through the heart of the ACLU vampire: create martyrs.
How many tachers and administrators who "stand their ground" can they arrest? How many students can they be allowed to inconvenience and injure?
On another facet of the potential development of this stupid strategy, what if, say, one million normal Americans pledge $1 a month put into a fund to support arrested teachers, administrators and their families while they are in jail? For as long as it takes?
I'm guessing that would take care of at least 150 prisoners of conscience and their families.
Double that contributon and it's still a pittance for the average American.
How long would the ACLU be able to afford that?
I would further suggest that any accused and arrested insist of individual trials!
I further expect that a significant number of businesses and wealthy patrons would step forward to provide additional funds.
It's a war they want?
The biggest difference between the ACLU and the standard ambulance chaser that I can discern is that the ACLU is not looking for offenders with money, but one with Christian influence to lose. So I guess the ACLU is funded in some non ambulance chaser way.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.