Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Alia
Would these also, perhaps fall under the category of "unintended consequences" and would, under this new ruling, ban students from posting "opinions, directions to events, etc. could it happen?

Good question. Wonder what the regents of Colorado.. I mean Ward Churchill U would say?? How about discussion in classrooms of schools receiving federal funds?

37 posted on 06/10/2005 11:38:59 AM PDT by JesseJane (2008 is TOO Late.. Toss the RINOS in 2006.. remember the Ratpack 7.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]


To: JesseJane
I mean Ward Churchill U would say?? How about discussion in classrooms of schools receiving federal funds?

SHWANG! I hadn't even gotten there. I know in CA, the UC's with their ACLU buddies and their multi-cultie buddies have two years past written (and authorized) their own version of some type of teacher protection "act". Meaning, it pretty much exempts "teachers" from penalties due saying whatever they want in classes subsidized by state and fed funds. I don't know which would have precedence: McCain-Feingold or the Teacher's Unions..

38 posted on 06/10/2005 4:01:27 PM PDT by Alia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson