Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: robertpaulsen
We aren't at war with Cuba either. Yet we have an arguably legal embargo.

-- As usual, you want to nitpick over details while you ignore the Constitutional issues.

Why is it you want to believe a majority can issue prohibitions on objects using the guise of the commerce clause?

We have a(n) [arguably] legal embargo. We're not at war.

Exactly what I wrote just above.

You are in error to say that we must be at war in order to ban commerce with foreign nations.

You really are amusing paulsen, as you dance around nitpicking these issues. -- Admit it, you love all prohibitions. Even those on guns.

42 posted on 06/10/2005 6:55:08 AM PDT by P_A_I
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]


To: P_A_I
"nitpicking these issues"

Nitpicking? It's the subject of the article, doofus.

43 posted on 06/10/2005 7:14:19 AM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson