Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ottawaboy
The law has a clause that says the Quebec Charter has precedence over another act (even those passed after it), unless that act "expressly states that it applies despite the Charter."

Someone else mentioned to me something about a "notwithstanding" clause. Is that the same?

41 posted on 06/09/2005 10:28:15 AM PDT by inquest (FTAA delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]


To: inquest
"Someone else mentioned to me something about a "notwithstanding" clause. Is that the same?"

'The 'not withstanding clause' or Sec 33 of Canada's socialist imposed Constitution or Charter gives individual provinces the right to opt out of Court decisions founded upon same.

The Quebec (provincial or 'state') law cited is more like a 'launching pad' for invocation of this proviso.

Note that the hypocritical Liberals whine non-stop that every single word of their precious Charter is sacred while:
1. equating any mention of Sec 33 with veritable treason.
2. so successfully intimidating the provinces that they never invoke it.
3. applauding their hand-picked Judicial hacks whenever they 'read in' imagined 'rights' which aren't mentioned and ever some that Parliament - the peoples' duly elected representatives - specifically deemed not to include!
43 posted on 06/09/2005 10:58:28 AM PDT by GMMAC (paraphrasing Parrish: "damned Liberals, I hate those bastards!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson