To: DaveTesla
Jenna Jameson is a looker. I doubt people bought her biography for her life story than hoping to look at racy photos. They were disappointed it wasn't "hard-core" enough for them.
(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)
151 posted on
06/09/2005 12:47:43 AM PDT by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: goldstategop
This troubles me:
She maintains pornographic movies don't harm anyone, and
are beneficial in a way, providing safe fantasies for the
"lonely" public.
Last month, the actress was among five people arrested
at a new strip club in a suburb of Tacoma, Wash. All were
accused of violating the local adult-cabaret ordinance,
some by getting too close to customers and others
including Carey by touching themselves in a sexual
manner, according to the Associated Press.
Kulkis, 40, says he'll be representing the $10 billion
porn industry as well as his own company at the fund-
raiser. A native of Michigan, the English literature
major turned pornographer says he'd be surprised,
disappointed and upset if he were somehow turned away, but
he doesn't expect that to happen.
Would you invite them to your house for dinner?
152 posted on
06/09/2005 12:51:59 AM PDT by
DaveTesla
(You can fool some of the people some of the time......)
To: thompsonsjkc; odoso; animoveritas; DaveTesla; mercygrace; Laissez-faire capitalist; ...
Moral Absolutes Ping.
Another article about the porn star attending the fundraising dinner with Bush etc. The reason I am pinging this one out is because of the heated discussion on the thread. Some of you might want to chime in.
Some people consider porn harmless or even beneficial. I do not and I think it is poor judgement on the part of the presidents' people to have the whore and her pimp attending the dinner.
If the Republican party is going to go the way of "fiscally conservative and socially liberal" a lot of people who vote "R" will vote "R" no longer. Another point is that the fiscally conservative/socially liberal philosophy is schizophrenic and begets huge social problems which demand more money, so it quickly turns into "socially liberal and fiscally liberal". As in gov't money for AIDS patients, welfare for abandoned mothers and children, methadone clinics, increased police for punks raised with no fathers creating mayhem, etc.
Let me know if you want on/off this pinglist.
188 posted on
06/09/2005 6:37:53 AM PDT by
little jeremiah
(Resisting evil is our duty or we are as responsible as those promoting it.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson