[mdmathis6]

That's funny...pity the poor scientists not doing the research on creationism before they actually criticize it!

[RightWhale]

not doing the research on creationism

How would such research be conducted?

[VadeRetro]

That's funny...pity the poor scientists not doing the research on creationism before they actually criticize it!

There's another irony meter smoldering and smoking! The typical creationist argument is a strawman of evolution. Depending upon how you interpret the situation, it either 1) betrays complete ignorance of the actual theory of evolution on the part of the person making the argument or 2) hopes the target of the argument is completely ignorant.

[VadeRetro]

That's funny...pity the poor scientists not doing the research on creationism before they actually criticize it!

But, of course, the real point of my "You have to do research before you can mess it up," supposedly being answered by your text above, is that creation science "research" would be an oxymoron if it weren't for the activity known as "quote mining," the process of creatively mosaicing a lie from carefully selected tiles of truth.

But the Quote-Miner gets quote-mined: here's Henry Morris admitting how Creation Science Research is done.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1410029/posts?page=20#20, a good catch by PatrickHenry.