To: blam
Hhhmmmmmm - 400,000 years old? Humans?
5 posted on
06/08/2005 11:11:58 AM PDT by
mlc9852
To: mlc9852
Hhhmmmmmm - 400,000 years old? Humans? I dont believe it.
To: mlc9852
Are you suggesting nonhumans made the tools?
10 posted on
06/08/2005 11:14:56 AM PDT by
ASA Vet
(Keep the warrior princess happy, buy her ammo.)
To: mlc9852
Hhhmmmmmm - 400,000 years old? Humans? Not Homo sapiens, late H. erectus or a very early neanderthalensis.
15 posted on
06/08/2005 11:20:50 AM PDT by
dread78645
(Sorry Mr. Franklin, We couldn't keep it.)
To: mlc9852
“The primary studies on the tools did not reveal their exact age, so the tools were sent to Professor Marcel Otte of the University of Liege in Belgium. He happened to be in Iran and he dated the tools to be 400,000 years old,” Mahforuzi explained.This is where the 400K number came from. Give the stone tools to me and I will 'date' them to whatever age you desire.
17 posted on
06/08/2005 11:21:14 AM PDT by
backslacker
(For the LORD knoweth the way of the righteous: but the way of the ungodly shall perish (Ps 1:6))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson