Posted on 06/08/2005 5:13:10 AM PDT by ken5050
THAT is why we need George Allen as majority leader NOW. Then it's Allen for prez in 08 in any case.
Yes, if you Donkey's would shut up and vote, we could move on! First chart of the day!
And the answer is the same: IT'S ALL BUSH'S FAULT.
Thanks for the ping. I just got on. Going to read the thread now.
THAT is why we need George Allen as majority leader NOW. Then it's Allen for prez in 08 in any case.
TOTALLY AGREE!
Then why are you talking about it for the next 30 minutes, Senator?
The donks are SCARED. "Why are we wasting all of this time on these judges?
IOW...God please NY times, Please WAPO, help us get off of this subject.
The problem is that Bush does not govern by polls.
So...if Obama doesn't want someone to advance because they are black, then he is AGAINST affirmative action, right?
If that is the case, then he thinks more like JRB, than the CBC---who told him how to vote on this matter.
I wonder if the CBC agrees that people SHOULDN'T advance because they are black...if so, they better, never use affirmative action again!
Well Durbin got that right she is Exceptional! Though I think we disagree on the definition!
Get out, he did NOT say that! Good grief they have no idea how ridiculous they sound!
Because your guys won't go for Unanimus Consent. If they did we could get through Brown, Pryor, Kavanaugh, Haynes, Griffith, and the others all in one day....and then move on.
Of course the Dems want it both ways. Affirmative action for me but not for thee (conservative blacks).
I don't she got where she is because she is black, but rather because she is GOOD! Mr. Obama.
Disturbin Durbin actually beggin and pleadin!
Don't have the exact quote but yes he did say that.
Is that true? If she is, I'm gonna send her some $
He's nauseating! If I lived in Illnois, I'd move!
I tell ya'll what---if for some damnable reason JRB doesn't get voted in this afternoon...heaven forbid,
let's start a movement to put her on a ticket for 2008-VP, maybe???
This woman has too much to offer, and is way to forward thinking to be stopped by a bunch of partisan hacks in the senate!
The federal appeals courts used to have a mandatory retirement at 75, I believe it was. Has that been reversed, if anyone knows.
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/08/national/08harris.html?
Here is the article, if you don't want to register at the NY Times, I know I don't. go to www.realclearpolitics.com
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.