Suppose we have Fossil A and Fossil C. The species represented by Fossil C is believed to be descended from the species represented by Fossil A. Suppose you deny this connection, citing a 'gap' in the fossil record between the two species.
Suppose further than scientists discover Fossil B which, based upon observable evidence, is declared an intermediate species between Fossil A and Fossil B.
Do you:
1. Accept this as evidence of evolution.
2. Deny this is evidence of evolution, and assert that there are now two gaps in the fossil record?
...just give your direct evidence from the fossil record or observeable evidence today. Natural history museums around the world will want it, if you can provide it.