Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: r9etb; All
actually, yes, it does.
In a pure Darwinist society, people who had juvenile diabetes would not have children. Prior to clotting factors becoming available, how many hemophiliacs were able to have children?
Stop to think about the impact of Albert Schweitzer(?) had on AIDS, Ebola, Marburg, etc.
32 posted on 06/05/2005 7:27:42 PM PDT by olde north church (Opposed to spilling the blood of tyrants? I hope to bathe in it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: olde north church
In a pure Darwinist society, people who had juvenile diabetes would not have children.

Hm. Perhaps if you knew facts instead of opinions, you'd understand that the vast majority of new diabetes cases are in families where neither parent's family has a history of it. There's certainly no such history in either my or my wife's families -- nor is it the case in families of other diabetic kids I know.

Perhaps a bit of research would do you good.

33 posted on 06/05/2005 7:33:29 PM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson