Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Amore
No offense, really, but you seem to have an inflated idea of how much even "good" defense attorneys can achieve with a guilty client.

You sure about that?

3,786 posted on 06/13/2005 2:34:08 PM PDT by finnman69 (cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestus globus, inflammare animos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3698 | View Replies ]


To: finnman69

Sorry, my statement refers to the celebrity factor, not the richness-of-the-client factor. Lots of people with lots of money and "good" defense lawyers get convicted. Granted, it's harder, but it's mostly accomplished. Generally, most of the time -- leaving out anomalies like black celebrities in California -- a defense attorney is going to lose.

As I recall, you were talking about Peterson. You seriously think it was his attorney's fault? If so, stay tuned for Scotty's standard-defendant's post-conviction motion alleging ineffective assistance of trial counsel. Care to bet whether he succeeds?


3,854 posted on 06/13/2005 2:45:03 PM PDT by Amore (First, let's kill all the lawyers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3786 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson