I know this is a reading the tealeaves sort of thing but does anyone have an opinion as to how the readback of the victim's testimony favors either side? Just curious and waiting like everyone else.
Nancy Grace and Anne Bremner said it favors the pros ..others have said it favors no one..One said a read back takes all the emotion out of the hearing of the testimony, therefore lessening its effect.
Some say it is for reviewing inconsistencies...Take your pick..My crystal ball is made out of crackled glass and my tea leaves look like dregs only..I believe the alleged victim was molested and MJ is an immature, freaky pedophile..JMO.
From what I understand, the judge has prevented the press from knowing if the jury is requesting testimony or cross examination read backs, which could give one an idea of where the jury is going with a verdict.