I've seen no documentation that says either the Ontario Government says she is a sociopath or any that says she is one. She has undergone psychiatric examinations while imprisoned and now the government is attempting to control her using Section 810 not the Mental Health Act . That in itself should tell you she's not a psychopath ,
She may well have an evil look in her eye . Save us all if that becomes criteria for what in this case is nothing more than harassment motivated by stupid Liberal politicians
Poor choice of words on my part. The reports on her current mental health are mixed but I will admit they haven;t labeled her any sort of 'path to my understanding. What the credentials of the individuals making the reports are is unknown. She has passed off BS before but I will accept their assessments.
Professional opinions aside, since I ain't no fancy doctor, but there is more than just an evil eye at play here. Raping her own sister, participating in the death of that sister for the purposes of rape, remaining silent about it, marrying the man who she helped rape and kill her sister, participating willingly in the violent rapes and torturous confinement and deaths of two teenage girls (and she had ample opportunity to turn the girls free during their days of torture as the tapes would later prove), allegedly participating in the rape of another, the now famed Jane Doe and now by media accounts in a relationship with another murderer, does not sound like the kind of person I want living next door to me and my two little girls regardless of any label applied to her. That the level of her participation in a number of these events came to light only after the deal was signed is enough for me to question whether the deal stands and the punishment was reasonable.
If it was reasonable and to be fair, let a jury of her peers evaluate the case with what we know now. If they find a punishment of 12 years or less is suitable, then let her go. If not, tack on any balance they see fit and let her rot.