Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: muawiyah
Experience suggests that just about everyone making an argument in support of unregulating drug use is an abuser.

Any one who argues for an original intent interpretation of the Constitution is implicitly arguing for the federal "unregulation" of drug use, at least until it's properly authorized.

227 posted on 06/04/2005 5:05:39 AM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh, bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies ]


To: tacticalogic

Look, if George Washington knew then what we know now there'd been a federal agency in charge of regulating lead based paint!


237 posted on 06/04/2005 11:39:13 AM PDT by muawiyah (q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 227 | View Replies ]

To: tacticalogic

And ARSENIC based paint too~ Actually FUR SHUR.


244 posted on 06/04/2005 11:45:11 AM PDT by muawiyah (q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 227 | View Replies ]

To: tacticalogic

"Any one who argues for an original intent interpretation of the Constitution is implicitly arguing for the federal "unregulation" of drug use, at least until it's properly authorized."

Excellent point. Thanks.


457 posted on 06/07/2005 9:36:35 AM PDT by vigilo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 227 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson