Since the article made exactly the same point you made, I don't see how it can be "pure and unadulterated BS" -- unless you're calling your own statement "pure and unadulterated BS" too.
"Since the article made exactly the same point you made, I don't see how it can be "pure and unadulterated BS" -- unless you're calling your own statement "pure and unadulterated BS" too."
I guess you had better point out the error of my ways? I reread the article again, twice, and found nothing to substanciate your claim?