I have never heard them fight against it. Never. They only argue with the gay activists, never against them. I've never heard a Libertarian really argue for freedom as it seems the Founders defined it. They just want license. Anarchy. They are also relativists. I don't want any part of their mess. Besides, like I said before, they need to START with the money issue. As long as we all bear the financial burden for the failures of a few, liberty for some equals tyranny for others. When bad choices mean bad consequences -- a direct relationship -- then we can talk. Until then Libertarianism is nothing but fuel to the tyranny fire.
I have never heard them fight against it. Never. They only argue with the gay activists, never against them.
Have you ever searched out the libertarian positions on gay indoctrination? I doubt it, cause if you had, you would have found plenty of argument against it.
They just want license. Anarchy. They are also relativists.
You are right here about some libertarians. You are also wrong here when speaking about the majority of libertarians, in or out of the Libertarian Party. What you say here is actually a better description of republicans and democrats than it is of libertarians.
When bad choices mean bad consequences -- a direct relationship -- then we can talk.
Libertarians use more resources, in far greater percentages than the republicans do to bring about a government where "bad choices mean bad consequences." If that is what you are honestly looking for, then the LP is your party. The LP could just as easily been named the Responsibility Party. No other political party in America today advocates the level of personal responsibility that the LP advocates.
Maybe because you've not cared to pay attention.
Using your same 'logic', I've never heard an intelligent word out of your mouth. Does that mean you're stupid as I've implied or that I've not heard ANY words out of your mouth?
CAN YOU HEAR ME? I CAN DIRECT YOU TO A DOCTOR WHO CAN PRESCIRBE A HEARING AID FOR YOU!