Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: muawiyah; All; AntiBurr

An intersting sidenote: I recently read a book by conservative columnist Dinesh D'Souza. He wrote that if we get enough judges through, they can declare progressive income taxation a violation of the equal protection clause of the 14th amendment. This would mandate a flat income tax (if there were an income tax at all).

Thoughts?


79 posted on 05/30/2005 7:35:59 PM PDT by Remember_Salamis (A nation which can prefer disgrace to danger is prepared for a master, and deserves one!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]


To: Remember_Salamis
The Supreme Court as it's currently constituted doesn't particularly care what order amendments were passed, so I suppose the guy's right.

Now you talk about a body that should be elected "by the states", the Supreme Court could be constituted as a body with rotating membership, with each state sending in one justice for one year as it's turn came up.

Now, should we then take a justice out and shoot him after his term is up? I don't know. Haven't thought that one through. Judges are a little different than Senators after all. They all wear the same color clothes to work for one thing.

82 posted on 05/30/2005 7:39:04 PM PDT by muawiyah (q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson