Ummmm, could someone please remind the author of a minor little event called "Desert Storm" where upon America rescued the Mideast from Saddam's evil intentions?
A quick read of some of her previous articles reveals that she does not necessarily accept that Iraqi troops were in fact massed on the Kuwaiti border, nor that Desert Storm was necessary even "if" they had been there.
She is somehow intent on the notion that America wants to execute a military takeover of "The Kingdom", she insists upon capitalising 'H' when referring to the "holy" cities of Mecca and Medina, and in general she is such an avowed apologist for Saudi Arabia and the middle east in general, and a "bash-America" first archetype that she is intellectually and emotionally beyond salvage.
IMHO after reading snippets of her writings (which include diatribes of thin scholarship against Judeo-Christianity, comparing it to Al Qaeda) she must almost certainly be an anti-semite, of the camp that believes Jews had more to do with 9/11 than Arabs, and that America brought 9/11 upon herslf in part by our actions in having troops on Saudi land.
I would say ignoring her might be the best policy, in hopes that the less of an audience she has, the less inclined to purvey her poison she might be. But she has served in an advisory role for many business concerns, and albeit her "expertise" is self-styled, there is still an audience of well-heeled folk who read and listen to her incintrovertibly biased screeds and screechings.
So it is that she thinks she is important, and that her opinion should shape policy and affect we, the great unwashed.
Assassination would be one possible remedy for the problem she herself is. Any volunteers out there?