Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: hinckley buzzard
Eternal vigilance.

If China were a republic, where the will of the people kept their government in check, I would tend to agree whole heartidly. But they are not, and their rapid military expansion and their current belligerence and threats as tregards Taiwan, coupled with their past actions against their own people and in places like Tibet, makes it clear that there is much greater chance for their motives to be ulterior than not.

That's my point. We must counter such "friendly" ties with stronger ties of our own as regards India. Just my own opinion on the matter.

52 posted on 05/30/2005 9:02:24 AM PDT by Jeff Head
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]


To: Jeff Head; Strategerist

BLACKWILL: 'I killed snakes of anti-India US ayatollahs'

The Indian Express | Tuesday, May 24, 2005 at 1052 hours IST | The Press Trust of India

Posted on 05/25/2005 6:39:32 AM EDT by CarrotAndStick

Washington, May 24: No bilateral relationship during US President George W. Bush's first term improved as much as that between the US and India, former US ambassador to India Robert D. Blackwill has said.

"From the beginning, the President saw India as an answer to some of America's major geopolitical problems, rather than, as did his immediate predecessor, as a persistent non-proliferation problem that required an American-imposed solution," he wrote in an article India, our natural ally in leading American quarterly The National Interest.

Some attribute this expansion in relations to the impact of 9/11. But this is not the case, he said.

Blackwill said President Bush and his (then) National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice perceived India as a strategic opportunity for the United States and not a constantly irritating recalcitrant.

Right from the start, beginning with the transition, the White House developed a strategy to invigorate US-India ties and decided to stop hectoring India about its nuclear weapons.

"We began to speak about transforming the US-India relationship," he said.

For most of the President's first four years, Blackwill reveals, this strategic objective produced a constant struggle with two entrenches forces in the bureaucracy of the US government.

"The first were the non-proliferation 'ayatollahs,' as the Indians call them, who, despite the fact that the White House was intentionally redefining our relationship, sought to maintain without essential change all of the non-proliferation approaches towards India that had been pursued in the Clinton administration," he wrote.

"During the first year of the Bush presidency, I vividly recall receiving routine instructions in New Delhi from the State Department all the counterproductive language from the Clinton administration's approach to India's nuclear weapons programme," Blackwill said.

"These nagging nannies were alive and well in that State Department labyrinth. I, of course, did not implement those instructions. It took me months and many calls to the White House to finally cut off the head of this snake back home."

The second, says Blackwill, is related to what he would call the "hyphenators," those within the US government who would view India only through a Pakistan-India perspective.

With respect to their public statements during these years, if one does a search using the word "India," one will find invariably that the word "Pakistan" appears in the same sentence or the following sentences, or both.

The former envoy said while the intellectual basis for transforming the US-Indian relationship was firmly in place in the first term, the implementation was sometimes halting because of constant bureaucratic combat.

The visit of Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice to New Delhi in March demonstrated that the US-Indian relationship is now being rapidly accelerated.

"In my view the US should now integrate India into the evolving global non-proliferation regime as a friendly nuclear weapons state. We should end constraints on assistance to and cooperation with India's civil nuclear industry and high-tech trade, changing laws and policy whe/bn necessary. We should sell civil nuclear reactors to India, both to reduce the demand for Persian Gulf energy and to ease the environmental impact of India's vibrant economic growth.

54 posted on 05/30/2005 9:15:56 AM PDT by CarrotAndStick (The articles posted by me needn't necessarily reflect my opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson