Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: A.J.Armitage

That was the conventional formal way of dating documents then. Why was there no other mention of religion in the document except where government involvement in it is prohibited?


63 posted on 05/28/2005 11:53:21 AM PDT by NooGeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]


To: NooGeye
That was the conventional formal way of dating documents then.

Am I to believe that the Founders, who had made a revolution, were such slaves of convention they couldn't possibly use the simple expedient of writing "1787" and thus were forced into calling Jesus Lord?

Why was there no other mention of religion in the document except where government involvement in it is prohibited?

Where else would you expect it?

74 posted on 05/28/2005 9:08:05 PM PDT by A.J.Armitage (http://calvinist-libertarians.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson