To: King Prout
Your reply wasn't worth replying to. Dawkins views on religion obtain when Dawkins speaks of science and religion in the same breath. When he does, his views are subject to criticism. Preety simple, nothing ad hominem about it.
If you want to see ad hominem, just look at Retros posts, he's an expert.
To: jwalsh07
"his views" do not equate to the points he raised in this article.
"criticism" requires address to the points raised in the subject matter at hand.
ad hominem dismissal does not equate to criticism.
539 posted on
05/25/2005 7:17:28 PM PDT by
King Prout
(blast and char it among fetid buzzard guts!)
To: RightWingNilla; King Prout; VadeRetro; AntiGuv; Junior
What is wrong with you guys? Virtual Ignore is the only appropriate response. You're letting a good thread degenerate into utter putridity.
542 posted on
05/25/2005 7:19:20 PM PDT by
PatrickHenry
(Felix, qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas. The List-O-Links is at my homepage.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson