You're in luck!
And yet, no experiments I can actually perform come to mind, apropos to my initial objection: that I see design in every detail of every living thing. Your example is not enlightening me. I don't see why the test proposed points to as yet undiscovered ID evolutionary explanations any more than it points to as yet undiscovered Darwinian evolutionary explanations. Perhaps you could explain, so I can model my proposed experiments after the one published in an italian journal that ranks below the top 100,000 in cite frequency, and is edited by an avowed anti-darwinist.
Why do you think there are so many, as you say, "avowed anti-darwinist" scientists? Just curious.