To: furball4paws
These are not spontaneous adaptations through natural selection - these are intentional hybrids.
Horticulture, not Darwinism.
250 posted on
05/25/2005 10:45:58 AM PDT by
wideawake
(God bless our brave troops and their Commander-in-Chief)
To: wideawake
No scientist has ever taken the basic elements and made a human being. They can't even make a simple flower. Manipulating genes to make something 'new' isn't new at all.
255 posted on
05/25/2005 10:48:52 AM PDT by
cyborg
(Serving fresh, hot Anti-opus since 18 April 2005)
To: wideawake
The Helianthus experiments were designed to repeat what happened naturally, and they just did that. That, semi-asleep-wideawake is what is called testing a theory. And the answer was unequivocal.
285 posted on
05/25/2005 11:48:49 AM PDT by
furball4paws
(One of the last Evil Geniuses, or the first of their return.)
To: wideawake
Okay, so if speciation can be accomplished by nothing more than breeding, why can't it happen that way naturally?
332 posted on
05/25/2005 1:09:43 PM PDT by
Junior
(“Even if you are one-in-a-million, there are still 6,000 others just like you.”)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson