If you are looking for more, please let me know!
I apologize; this thread is becoming too large for me to keep track of. As far as addressing your post, you give 3 falsifications for the idea of ID. b) and c) I won't consider, at least with regard to the process of mutation and natural selection. I won't mention b) since if we agree that a process of mutation and natural selection occurs, then there must have been an inception to that process, and c) since that involves the definition of intelligence. I am willing to stipulate that all the given properties are properties of intelligence. However, I have a problem with a), namely that it gives a general idea of how to falsify ID, but is vague.
What qualifies as evidence for or against the presence of an algorithm? To better illustrate the problem I have, I'll postulate a simpler question. Given a table with 20 sequentially numbered coins lying on it, it is possible to write down a sequence of heads and tails showing on these coins. Given a particular heads/tails sequence, how would you determine whether that sequence resulted from intelligent design or from just randomly dropping them on the table? (Assume that the coins are randomly dispersed on the table, and not for example aligned in a straight line or some other regular arrangement) Even if the sequence is something like HTHTHTHTHTHTHTHTHTHT, which would give every appearance of being formed via an algorithm, it is not possible without observing the formation of the sequence, to rule out the possibility that the coins just happened to land in this sequence by being randomly dropped on the table. You might argue that it is highly unlikely that this particular sequence would arise just by chance, namely that only in 1 out of 2^20 times would you expect it to form by being randomly dropped. The problem with this argument is that it applies equally well to a more random-seeming sequence such as HTTHHHTHTTTHTHHHTTHT. The probability of that sequence occurring randomly is exactly the same as the probability of the "less random" sequence given earlier forming the same way. In fact, can you tell from my post whether I intentionally and consciously designed the above "more random" sequence or if I derived it by actually tossing a coin 20 times?