Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jwalsh07
No, I'm not a lawyer but I can read a dictionary.
libel
• noun 1 the publication of a false statement that is damaging to a person’s reputation. Compare with SLANDER. 2 a written defamation.
• verb (libelled, libelling; US libeled, libeling) defame by publishing a libel.

publish
• verb 1 prepare and issue (a book, newspaper, piece of music, etc.) for public sale. 2 print in a book, newspaper, or journal so as to make generally known. 3 announce formally. 4 communicate (a libel) to a third party.

Claiming that Dawkins would ban religion is false and defamatory and you have written it publicly. It is therefore libel. You really think people are too stupid to see through your bluster. It is amazing.
2,223 posted on 06/01/2005 7:11:34 PM PDT by edsheppa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2218 | View Replies ]


To: edsheppa
Favoring stamping out religion seems like a ban that is effective. Granted I don't know how Dawkins proposes to carry out his agenda. Maybe he just wants the government to turn schools into brain washings institutions, and reach the minds and hearts of the young and thereby cause religion to die a natural death. He seems annoyed about the influence religious parents have on their young. How might that influence be "stamped out?" Why don't you ask him how he proposes to go about implementation?

Dawkin seems like an extremist. I think extremists usually tend to spoiliate the public square.

By the way expression of opinion are not libelous per se.

2,237 posted on 06/01/2005 9:41:42 PM PDT by Torie (Constrain rogue state courts; repeal your state constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2223 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson