Still going with the Creationist Big Lie approach I see. Well I knew you were full of it from the beginning. So I emailed Professor Dawkins and asked him directly if he favors banning religion. He emailed back and said it is a "preposterous lie." I think that makes you a preposterous liar.
I'll definitely keep a link to this thread. When you make another preposterous lie, I can simply link the lurkers to it. Way to flush your credibility down the toilet. Keep it up. You're doing wonders for your cause.
Ed, when I offer an opinion you can consider it right or wrong. That's up to you. Calling me a creationist liar proves nothing except perhaps that you are limited in your ability to intellectually oppose my opinion so you resort to what you guys call ad hominem argumentum. I think that's what you call it at any rate.
Richard Dawkins: “Society, for no reason that I can discern, accepts that parents must have an automatic right to bring their children up with particular religious opinions and can withdraw them from say, biology classes that teach evolution.”
If you think that is the writing of a man in favor of religious liberty, you're whacked. But perhaps you should ask Dawkins if his evil twin wrote it?
Thanks.