To: Condorman; general_re
How do you know, when you see a "man-made" object, that it is man-made? We once had a very interesting thread on this: The Design Inference Game.
1,912 posted on
05/30/2005 9:23:38 AM PDT by
PatrickHenry
(Felix, qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas. The List-O-Links is at my homepage.)
To: PatrickHenry; Condorman; general_re; Fester Chugabrew
How do you know, when you see a "man-made" object, that it is man-made?Are you people still debating this? I though it was settled several hundred posts ago: evidence of the application of manual implements.
If you can't figure it out by glancing at it, then pick it up and study it. LOL
To: PatrickHenry
Especially for you, I've made a sound snippet with your honey-bunny, Kathy Martin, where she admits not to have read the proposed Kansas science standard draft. 30 seconds of pure Kathy Martin (119kb MP3) |
1,951 posted on
05/30/2005 2:12:47 PM PDT by
anguish
(while science catches up.... mysticism!)
To: PatrickHenry; general_re
The Design Inference Game.I remember it. I also seem to remember that diamond dropped the ball on round 2.
2,093 posted on
05/31/2005 2:42:21 PM PDT by
Condorman
(Changes aren't permanent, but change is.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson