This definition of ID contains, among other things, an implicit assumption of vitalism, a concept that thas rather thoroughly been rejected on many grounds.
Likewise, the definition doesn't give any hint what "intellegence" is. Nor does is give any indication that such a determination is possible.
Well, yes, but every definition of ID contains an implicit assumption of vitalism. That is a problem of ID, not a problem of our definition, which cannot define ID as anything other than what ID is.. LOL