[PatrickHenry]

Now I'm getting super-picky. Consider this:

Intelligent Design: A hypothesis wherein that given features of life v non-life that are otherwise inexplicable are explained by an intelligent cause, rather than by an undirected process such as natural selection.

[HiTech RedNeck]

"according to which" :-)

[PatrickHenry]

You started out, back in post 1,527, saying "any biological process" and changed that in 1,531 to "given features of life v non-life" based on Alamo-Girl's post 1,516. In 1,555 you explained "Everything is a feature of life v non-life."

Is it too late to suggest going back, and saying something like "certain biological features or processes"? That would give us something like this:

Intelligent Design: A hypothesis wherein that given features of life v non-life certain biological features or processes that are otherwise inexplicable are explained by an intelligent cause, rather than by an undirected process such as natural selection.

Here's a cleaned-up version:

Intelligent Design: A hypothesis that certain biological features or processes that are otherwise inexplicable are explained by an intelligent cause, rather than by an undirected process such as natural selection.