Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Fester Chugabrew
Both concepts bring emotional baggage that should be held in check.

Do some reading at this site before you characterize what we're doing. Most of the terms have been around long enough for even you to accept them. (Try clicking on the link. It's to a site that explains logical fallacies, and has nothing to do with evolution).

Does the fact that mathematical statistics, probabilities, and calculations may result in astronomical figures negate their usefulness as a tool for giving evidence of intelligence or design?

No, it's that the mathematical statistics, paroabilities, and calculations are based on numbers that have no known relationship to the phenomena they're attempting to describe.

Here's an image of a man on the side of a mountain:

Intelligent design?

1,029 posted on 05/26/2005 6:09:18 PM PDT by Gumlegs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1026 | View Replies ]


To: Gumlegs
You know the rules against publishing falsified data.


1,037 posted on 05/26/2005 6:21:32 PM PDT by js1138 (e unum pluribus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1029 | View Replies ]

To: Gumlegs

Seems to me we discussed this earlier. He fell off a year or two ago. Intelligent design?


1,040 posted on 05/26/2005 6:22:32 PM PDT by furball4paws (One of the last Evil Geniuses, or the first of their return.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1029 | View Replies ]

To: Gumlegs
Intelligent design?

Absolutely. The designer was the one that composed the photograph.(the rock formation itself has redesigned itself)

But you may not recognize it now.

Intelligent design?

1,075 posted on 05/26/2005 7:01:34 PM PDT by AndrewC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1029 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson